In re Jones

Court of Appeals of Maryland

In re Jones

731 A.2d 437, 354 Md. 328, 1999 Md. LEXIS 322

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 7, 1999

DocketMisc. No. 5

StatusPublished

This text of 731 A.2d 437 (In re Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jones, 731 A.2d 437, 354 Md. 328, 1999 Md. LEXIS 322 (Md. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

BELL, Chief Judge.

The Court having considered the adverse recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners for admission to the Bar of Maryland of the applicant, Steven Richard Jones, the exceptions filed by the applicant, and the oral argument of applicant’s counsel presented at a show cause hearing held before this Court on June 4, 1999, it is this 7th day of June, 1999

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the adverse recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners be, and it is hereby, overruled, and it is further

ORDERED that the applicant, upon taking the oath prescribed by the statute, be admitted to the practice of law in this State, subject only to the filing of an updating oath as to the character information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

BELL, Chief Judge.

The Court having considered the adverse recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners for admission to the Bar of Maryland of the applicant, Steven Richard Jones, the exceptions filed by the applicant, and the oral argument of applicant’s counsel presented at a show cause hearing held before this Court on June 4, 1999, it is this 7th day of June, 1999

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the adverse recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners be, and it is hereby, overruled, and it is further

ORDERED that the applicant, upon taking the oath prescribed by the statute, be admitted to the practice of law in this State, subject only to the filing of an updating oath as to the character information.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

731 A.2d 437, 354 Md. 328, 1999 Md. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jones-md-1999.