In re Jones

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Jones

157 So. 3d 583, 2015 La. LEXIS 224, 2015 WL 591625

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 13, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-B-2449

StatusPublished

This text of 157 So. 3d 583 (In re Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jones, 157 So. 3d 583, 2015 La. LEXIS 224, 2015 WL 591625 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he practiced law while ineligible to do so and failed to cooperate with the ODC in its investigation. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Derrick Damond Jones, Louisiana Bar Roll number 28298, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, which suspension commences from the effective date of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty [584]*584days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he practiced law while ineligible to do so and failed to cooperate with the ODC in its investigation. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Derrick Damond Jones, Louisiana Bar Roll number 28298, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, which suspension commences from the effective date of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty [584]*584days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 So. 3d 583, 2015 La. LEXIS 224, 2015 WL 591625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jones-la-2015.