In re Jones

177 A.3d 614
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 25, 2018
DocketNo. 17-BG-1251; 2017 DDN 192
StatusPublished

This text of 177 A.3d 614 (In re Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jones, 177 A.3d 614 (D.C. 2018).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction; this court’s December 5, 2017, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the response thereto, and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit; and the December 29, 2017, letter from Disciplinary Counsel stating that any discipline should be imposed nunc, pro tunc to December 5, 2017, it is

ORDERED that Rodney Michael Jones is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia nunc pro tunc to December 5, 2017. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (re-buttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 A.3d 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jones-dc-2018.