Home/D.C. Circuit/In re Jones

In re Jones

9 F.2d 1016, 56 App. D.C. 400, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2386
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 1926
DocketNo. 1798
StatusPublished

This text of 9 F.2d 1016 (In re Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jones, 9 F.2d 1016, 56 App. D.C. 400, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2386 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office, refusing the 13 claims of an application for patent on a seamless, tubular, knitted fabric (a stocking), and thq process of knitting the same.

We have carefully examined the decisions of the Primary Examiner ánd the Examiners in Chief, in which these claims are considered with reference to the prior art, and are convinced of the correctness of their conclusions, affirmed by the decision of the Assistant Commissioner. Not deeming it necessary to restate the reasoning of the Patent Office, we affirm the decision, without more.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F.2d 1016, 56 App. D.C. 400, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jones-cadc-1926.