In re Jones

710 F. App'x 143
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 2018
DocketNo. 17-2386
StatusPublished

This text of 710 F. App'x 143 (In re Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jones, 710 F. App'x 143 (4th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James J’Mori Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, in which he raised actual innocence and ineffective assistance of counsel claims. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court entered a memorandum opinion and order on December 13, 2017, in which it denied Jones’ actual innocence claim and scheduled an evidentiary hearing regarding his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Accordingly, because the district court has recently acted on Jones’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 F. App'x 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jones-ca4-2018.