in Re Jonathan L. Bolden
This text of in Re Jonathan L. Bolden (in Re Jonathan L. Bolden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 2, 2014
No. 04-14-00816-CR
IN RE Jonathan L. BOLDEN
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
On November 24, 2014, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on December 2nd, 2014.
_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of December, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 20014CR0957, styled The State of Texas v. Jonathan L. Bolden, pending in the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary D. Roman presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jonathan L. Bolden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jonathan-l-bolden-texapp-2014.