in Re: Jonathan Bradford Williams
This text of in Re: Jonathan Bradford Williams (in Re: Jonathan Bradford Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 1, 2003
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-03-00401-CV
IN RE JONATHAN BRADFORD WILLIAMS, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Jonathan Bradford Williams, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. He requests that this Court compel respondent (1) to reduce the amount of his bail in three pending felony charges.
The petition must be denied because it does not include a certificate of service reflecting that respondent was served, as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5.
Even if the petition met this requirement, it would nevertheless be denied because the amount of bail set is a matter of the trial court's discretion. Nguyen v. State, 881 S.W.2d 141, 143 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, no pet.). Mandamus will issue to correct a "clear abuse of discretion" committed by the trial court. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). However, relator has not provided this Court with a record demonstrating that the amount of bail set is a clear abuse of the trial court's discretion.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Nuchia and Hanks.
1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jonathan Bradford Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jonathan-bradford-williams-texapp-2003.