In re Jonathan B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jonathan B.

1 A.D.2d 1039, 767 N.Y.S.2d 376

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 2003

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 1039 (In re Jonathan B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jonathan B., 1 A.D.2d 1039, 767 N.Y.S.2d 376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Genesee County (Noonan, J.), entered June 14, 2000, which, inter alia, adjudged respondent a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sexual abuse in the first degree and sexual abuse in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130. 65 [1]) and sexual abuse in the second degree (§ 130.60 [2]). Contrary to respondent’s contention, the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to petitioner, is legally sufficient to establish the element of forcible compulsion beyond a reasonable doubt (see § 130.00 [8]; Matter of Rayshon Y., 196 AD2d 771 [1993]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Genesee County (Noonan, J.), entered June 14, 2000, which, inter alia, adjudged respondent a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sexual abuse in the first degree and sexual abuse in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130. 65 [1]) and sexual abuse in the second degree (§ 130.60 [2]). Contrary to respondent’s contention, the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to petitioner, is legally sufficient to establish the element of forcible compulsion beyond a reasonable doubt (see § 130.00 [8]; Matter of Rayshon Y., 196 AD2d 771 [1993]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 1039, 767 N.Y.S.2d 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jonathan-b-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack