In re: Johnson v.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2006·No. 06-7161·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7161

In Re: DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (0:01-cr-00677)

Submitted: August 25, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas L. Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Douglas L. Johnson petitions for writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion

to enforce plea agreement. After Johnson filed the instant

mandamus petition, the district court conducted a hearing on the

motion. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decision process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Johnson v., (4th Cir. 2006).

In re: Johnson v. (In re: Johnson v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.