In re Johnson
Opinion
Respondent, a municipal court judge in Hardeeville and Ridgeland and a ministerial recorder/clerk of court in Hardeeville, was indicted by a Federal Grand Jury on four counts of violating
IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and Respondent is placed on interim suspension in regard to her judicial positions. Additionally, as the administrative head of the unified judicial system and pursuant to article V, section 4 of the South Carolina Constitution, Respondent is suspended from her position as ministerial recorder/clerk of court. The municipalities of Hardeeville and Ridgeland are under no obligation to pay Respondent her salary during her suspensions. See In re Ferguson ,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent is prohibited from entering the premises of the municipal courts of Hardeeville and Ridgeland unless escorted by a law enforcement officer after authorization from the Chief Municipal Judges of Hardeeville or Ridgeland. Finally, Respondent is prohibited from having access to, destroying, or canceling any public records and is prohibited from access to any judicial databases or case management systems. This Order authorizes the appropriate government or law enforcement official to implement any of the prohibitions as stated in this Order.
*474This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining any judicial accounts of Respondent, shall serve as notice to the institution that Respondent is enjoined from having access to or making withdrawals from the accounts.
/s/ Donald W. Beatty, C. J.
FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
823 S.E.2d 473 (In re Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.