In re Johnson

198 A.3d 933, 236 N.J. 121
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 6, 2018·No. D-183 September Term 2017; 081637·Published

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 18-041, concluding that Edward Glen Johnson of Hackensack, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating *934RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation) and RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further determined that respondent should submit monthly reconciliations of his attorney trust account to the Office of Attorney Ethics on a quarterly basis, for a period of two years;

And good cause appearing;

**122It is ORDERED that Edward Glen Johnson is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall submit monthly reconciliations of his attorney trust account to the Office of Attorney Ethics on a quarterly basis, for a period of two years; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Johnson, 198 A.3d 933, 236 N.J. 121 (N.J. 2018).

198 A.3d 933 (In re Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.