In re Johnson

198 A.3d 933, 236 N.J. 121
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 6, 2018
DocketD-183 September Term 2017; 081637
StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.3d 933 (In re Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Johnson, 198 A.3d 933, 236 N.J. 121 (N.J. 2018).

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 18-041, concluding that Edward Glen Johnson of Hackensack, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating *934RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation) and RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further determined that respondent should submit monthly reconciliations of his attorney trust account to the Office of Attorney Ethics on a quarterly basis, for a period of two years;

And good cause appearing;

**122It is ORDERED that Edward Glen Johnson is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall submit monthly reconciliations of his attorney trust account to the Office of Attorney Ethics on a quarterly basis, for a period of two years; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 A.3d 933, 236 N.J. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-johnson-nj-2018.