In re Johnson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Johnson

275 So. 3d 872

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 26, 2019

DocketNO. 2019-B-0682

StatusPublished

This text of 275 So. 3d 872 (In re Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Johnson, 275 So. 3d 872 (La. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") submitted a joint *873petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he violated Rules 3.3(a)(1), 3.3(a)(2), 8.4(a), and 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Ernest L. Johnson, Louisiana Bar Roll number 7290, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, fully deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Genovese, J., would reject consent discipline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") submitted a joint *873petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he violated Rules 3.3(a)(1), 3.3(a)(2), 8.4(a), and 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Ernest L. Johnson, Louisiana Bar Roll number 7290, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, fully deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Genovese, J., would reject consent discipline.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 So. 3d 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-johnson-la-2019.