In re Johnson
This text of 651 F. App'x 236 (In re Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anton Johnson filed a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus challenging his civil commitment as a “sexually dangerous person” under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 4247-4248 (2012). This court ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and this case provides no reason to depart from the general rule. Moreover, we find that the interest of justice would not be served by transferring the case to the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2012). Accordingly, we deny Johnson leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [237]*237materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 F. App'x 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-johnson-ca4-2016.