in Re: Johnny Green, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 9, 2015
Docket08-15-00192-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Johnny Green, Jr. (in Re: Johnny Green, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Johnny Green, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

' No. 08-15-00192-CR ' IN RE: JOHNNY GREEN, JR., AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ' Relator. IN MANDAMUS '

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Johnny Green, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Honorable

Scott Wisch, Judge of the 372nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas. Relator seeks an order

compelling Respondent to unseal one volume of the reporter’s record which contains the jurors’

confidential information. We dismiss the mandamus petition for lack of jurisdiction.

To obtain mandamus relief, Relator must establish both that he has no adequate remedy

at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act not

involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial District Court

of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). A court of appeals has

jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against certain judges within its geographic district.

TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b)(West 2004). A court of appeals also has authority to issue a

writ of mandamus if it is necessary to enforce its jurisdiction. Id. § 22.221(a). Thus, we may

issue a writ of mandamus to a district judge outside of our district if he or she interferes with the

court’s jurisdiction. See id. at § 22.221(a); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex.App.-- Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding).

The underlying appeal, cause number 08-11-00317-CR, was transferred from the Second

Court of Appeals to the Eighth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued

by the Texas Supreme Court. We affirmed Relator’s direct appeal from his murder conviction

by opinion and judgment issued on November 22, 2013, and we issued our mandate on February

26, 2014. See Johnny Green v. State, 08-11-00317-CR, 2013 WL 6175127 (Tex.App.--El Paso

Nov. 22, 2013, pet. ref’d). On January 28, 2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals granted habeas

corpus relief and ordered that Relator would be permitted to file an out-of-time petition for

discretionary review. See Ex parte Johnny Green, No. WR-62,574-03 (Tex.Crim.App. Jan. 28,

2015). Relator filed his petition and the Court of Criminal Appeals refused it on June 17, 2015.

Given that Relator’s appeal is no longer pending before us, Relator cannot show that Respondent

has interfered with our appellate jurisdiction. Consequently, we do not have jurisdiction to grant

the requested relief. The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

July 8, 2015 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Washington
7 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Appeals at Texarkana
236 S.W.3d 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Johnny Green, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-johnny-green-jr-texapp-2015.