In re Johnetta T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Johnetta T.

192 A.D.2d 416, 595 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3846

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 A.D.2d 416 (In re Johnetta T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Johnetta T., 192 A.D.2d 416, 595 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Michael Gage, J.), entered April 7, 1992, adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of obstruction of governmental administration, and placing her on probation for 12 months, unanimously affirmed.

There is no merit to appellant’s claim that the court’s finding that she was guilty of obstruction of governmental administration is inherently inconsistent with the finding that she was innocent of the charge of resisting arrest. Since the elements of the crime of obstruction of governmental administration are separate and distinct from those of resisting arrest, there is no inherent inconsistency in the court’s finding. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Michael Gage, J.), entered April 7, 1992, adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of obstruction of governmental administration, and placing her on probation for 12 months, unanimously affirmed.

There is no merit to appellant’s claim that the court’s finding that she was guilty of obstruction of governmental administration is inherently inconsistent with the finding that she was innocent of the charge of resisting arrest. Since the elements of the crime of obstruction of governmental administration are separate and distinct from those of resisting arrest, there is no inherent inconsistency in the court’s finding. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 416, 595 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-johnetta-t-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack