in Re: John Wesley Patterson

418 S.W.3d 336, 2013 WL 6229533, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14588
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 2, 2013
Docket05-13-01534-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 418 S.W.3d 336 (in Re: John Wesley Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: John Wesley Patterson, 418 S.W.3d 336, 2013 WL 6229533, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14588 (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

OPINION

Opinion by Justice FITZGERALD.

Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not following a prior order of this Court. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levarlo, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim.App.2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim.App.2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District
34 S.W.3d 924 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Simon v. Levario
306 S.W.3d 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 S.W.3d 336, 2013 WL 6229533, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-wesley-patterson-texapp-2013.