in Re: John Wesley Patterson
This text of 418 S.W.3d 336 (in Re: John Wesley Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not following a prior order of this Court. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levarlo, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim.App.2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim.App.2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 S.W.3d 336, 2013 WL 6229533, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-wesley-patterson-texapp-2013.