In re John W. for a writ of Habeas Corpus

39 Kan. 125
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 15, 1888·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The defendants will be discharged, upon the authority of City of Miltonvale v. Lanoue, 35 Kas. 606. In that case it was said, among other things:

“Pending the appeal in the supreme court, [in a case for a fine and costs and imprisonment therefor, until paid,] we think the entire judgment is suspended — that with regard to the imprisonment, as well as that with regard to the payment of a fine or costs.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re John W. for a writ of Habeas Corpus, 39 Kan. 125 (kan 1888).

39 Kan. 125 (In re John W. for a writ of Habeas Corpus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Miltonvale v. Lanoue
35 Kan. 603 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1886)