in Re John Price
This text of in Re John Price (in Re John Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed August 9, 2016.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00889-CV
IN RE JOHN PRICE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-07681
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Evans Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which he seeks
extraordinary relief from the trial court’s partial summary judgment order. The facts and issues
are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly
abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,
148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we
conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a);
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we
DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
/s/ David Evans 160889F.P05 DAVID EVANS JUSTICE 1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re John Price, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-price-texapp-2016.