in Re: John Paul Hess
This text of in Re: John Paul Hess (in Re: John Paul Hess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
_________________________________________________________ _______
IN RE: JOHN PAUL HESS__________________________________________________________ ___
_________________________________________________________ __ ___
Relator, John Paul Hess, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency stay in the above cause on January 26, 2007. (2) The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus with appendix, the response with appendix filed by real party in interest, Donna Johnson, the reporter's record and the supplementation of the record, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
On January 26, 2007, this Court granted relator's motion for emergency stay of the trial court's orders dated January 22, 2007 and January 24, 2007, ordering production of documents identified in Exhibit A attached to real party's amended notice of intent to take Hess's oral deposition dated December 7, 2006. Having denied the petition, the stay is hereby lifted.
Furthermore, real party in interest's request for sanctions is denied.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 8th day of February, 2007.
1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: John Paul Hess, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-paul-hess-texapp-2007.