in Re: John Paul Hess

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 8, 2007
Docket13-07-00054-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: John Paul Hess (in Re: John Paul Hess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: John Paul Hess, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion





NUMBER 13-07-054-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________ _______



IN RE: JOHN PAUL HESS__________________________________________________________ ___



On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Motion for Emergency Stay

_________________________________________________________ __ ___

MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)



Relator, John Paul Hess, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency stay in the above cause on January 26, 2007. (2) The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus with appendix, the response with appendix filed by real party in interest, Donna Johnson, the reporter's record and the supplementation of the record, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

On January 26, 2007, this Court granted relator's motion for emergency stay of the trial court's orders dated January 22, 2007 and January 24, 2007, ordering production of documents identified in Exhibit A attached to real party's amended notice of intent to take Hess's oral deposition dated December 7, 2006. Having denied the petition, the stay is hereby lifted.

Furthermore, real party in interest's request for sanctions is denied.



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 8th day of February, 2007.

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

2.

Hugo Xavier de los Santos is also identified as a relator in this proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: John Paul Hess, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-paul-hess-texapp-2007.