in Re John Patrick Winters
This text of in Re John Patrick Winters (in Re John Patrick Winters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 21, 2007
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-07-00467-CR
IN RE JOHN PATRICK WINTERS, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator John Patrick Winters requests that this Court compel respondent to make ruling on relator's motion for nunc pro tunc. Relator contends that he is entitled to jail time credit that he demanded from respondent and that respondent refused.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We first observe that the granting of credit for jail time has historically been accomplished by post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. P. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2006); Ex parte Dunn, 976 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
In addition, there are three prerequisites for the issuance of a writ of mandamus by an appellate court, namely: (1) the lower court must have a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act; (2) the relator must make a demand for performance; and (3) the subject court must refuse that request. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Relator has not provided us with a record that shows that he made any request of the respondent to perform a nondiscretionary act that respondent refused.
The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Jennings, and Keyes.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re John Patrick Winters, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-patrick-winters-texapp-2007.