in Re John Patrick Winters

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 21, 2007·No. 01-07-00467-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 21, 2007





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-07-00467-CR



IN RE JOHN PATRICK WINTERS, Relator



Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator John Patrick Winters requests that this Court compel respondent to make ruling on relator's motion for nunc pro tunc. Relator contends that he is entitled to jail time credit that he demanded from respondent and that respondent refused.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We first observe that the granting of credit for jail time has historically been accomplished by post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. P. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2006); Ex parte Dunn, 976 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

In addition, there are three prerequisites for the issuance of a writ of mandamus by an appellate court, namely: (1) the lower court must have a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act; (2) the relator must make a demand for performance; and (3) the subject court must refuse that request. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Relator has not provided us with a record that shows that he made any request of the respondent to perform a nondiscretionary act that respondent refused.

The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM



Panel consists of Justices Taft, Jennings, and Keyes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re John Patrick Winters, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

in Re John Patrick Winters (in Re John Patrick Winters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnes v. State
832 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Ex Parte Dunn
976 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)