In re: John O. Murrin, III v.
This text of 571 F. App'x 508 (In re: John O. Murrin, III v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Attorney John Murrin appeals the district court’s 1 order effectively reinstating an earlier court order suspending him from practicing law in the District of Minnesota. Upon careful review, we con- *509 elude that Murrin’s constitutional arguments are without merit, and we find no abuse of discretion. See In re Hoare, 155 F.3d 937, 940 (8th Cir.1998) (disciplinary orders are reviewed for abuse of discretion; district court’s authority to suspend attorney is inherent power derived from attorney’s role as officer of court). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
571 F. App'x 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-o-murrin-iii-v-ca8-2014.