In Re John M. Sharp

995 A.2d 228, 2010 WL 1995831
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2010·No. 10-BG-198·Published

Opinion

*229 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified copy of the Supreme Court of Louisiana’s order disbarring respondent, this court’s March 19, 2010, order directing respondent to show cause why identical discipline should not be imposed, to which no response has been filed, and the Statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has not filed the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that John M. Sharp is hereby disbarred. Respondent’s actions would constitute misconduct in this jurisdiction and disbarment is within the range of sanctions we too would impose. In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190, 191 (D.C.1990) (en banc). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re John M. Sharp, 995 A.2d 228, 2010 WL 1995831 (D.C. 2010).

995 A.2d 228 (In Re John M. Sharp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Addams
579 A.2d 190 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)