in Re: John M. O'Quinn, PC, D/B/A O'Quinn & Laminack

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 24, 2007
• Docket: 12-06-00188-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

                NO. 12-06-00188-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: JOHN M. O’QUINN, P.C.,

d/b/a O’QUINN & LAMINACK,      §

JOHN M. O’QUINN & ASSOCIATES,

a TEXAS GENERAL PARTNERSHIP,

JOHN M. O’QUINN & ASSOCIATES,      §          ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

L.L.P., d/b/a O’QUINN & LAMINACK,

JOHN M. O’QUINN LAW FIRM,

P.L.L.C., AND O’QUINN & LAMINACK, §

RELATORS  

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

            On December 20, 2006, this Court delivered an opinion conditionally granting the petition for writ of mandamus filed by John M. O’Quinn, P.C., d/b/a O’Quinn & Laminack, John M. O’Quinn & Associates, a Texas General Partnership, John M. O’Quinn & Associates, L.L.P., d/b/a O’Quinn & Laminack, John M. O’Quinn Law Firm, P.L.L.C., and O’Quinn & Laminack.  That opinion ordered Respondent to vacate his order signed on April 14, 2006 denying the relators’ motion to vacate the arbitrators’ class determination award.  On January 5, 2007, Respondent complied with our order and opinion of December 20, 2006.

            All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need not issue.  Accordingly, this original proceeding is dismissed as moot.

Opinion delivered January 24, 2007.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)