in Re John L. Haverland
This text of in Re John L. Haverland (in Re John L. Haverland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-21-00346-CV & 13-21-00347-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE JOHN L. HAVERLAND
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Order Per Curiam
On October 12, 2021, relator John L. Haverland filed a petition for writ of
mandamus and a motion for stay regarding transfer orders issued in trial court cause
numbers 2020-PR-00247-4 and 2021-PR-00072-4 in the County Court at Law No. 4 of
Nueces County, Texas. We docketed the petition for writ of mandamus regarding these
orders in our appellate cause numbers 13-21-00346-CV and 13-21-00347-CV
respectively. By petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks to compel the trial court to
vacate its transfer orders, and by motion for stay, relator seeks to stay the trial court’s transfer orders pending resolution of this original proceeding.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to stay, is of the
opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the motion to stay, and we order
the trial court’s transfer orders issued in cause numbers 2020-PR-00247-4 and 2021-PR-
00072-4 to be stayed pending further order of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b)
(“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case
is finally decided.”).
The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Rodney Matocha, Joe Wayne
Sutherland, and Tammye Duckworth, in their capacities as Independent Co-
Administrators with Will Annexed of the Estate of Beatrice Jonet Mason, and as
Independent Co-Executors of the Estate of Hilbur Alfred Mason, or any others whose
interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for
writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See
id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 13th day of October, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re John L. Haverland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-l-haverland-texapp-2021.