in Re John Kearney, Attorney
This text of in Re John Kearney, Attorney (in Re John Kearney, Attorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-404-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________
IN RE JOHN KEARNEY, ATTORNEY
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Garza, and Wittig
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, John Kearney, attorney, filed a motion for emergency stay and petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on August 5, 2004. On August 5, 2004, the Court granted the motion for emergency stay and requested a response from the real parties in interest, LuAnn Whitehead and the State of Texas, and respondent, the Honorable J. Manuel Banales.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response from the real party in interest is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Our stay of the trial court proceedings is hereby ordered LIFTED. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 18th day of August, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re John Kearney, Attorney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-kearney-attorney-texapp-2004.