in Re: John Jacob Presley

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 16, 2015
Docket12-15-00255-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: John Jacob Presley (in Re: John Jacob Presley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: John Jacob Presley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NO. laiszooasff-cg- S S s ^Appeate District IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OCT 162015

FOR THE TWELFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRIi TYUER TEXAS j*WESTES, CLERK TYLER, TEXAS

JOHN JACOB PRESLEY, Relator

v.

PRESIDING JUDGE, 420TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Respondent

APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM NACOGDOCHES COUNTY

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, John Jacob Presley, Relator in the above-styled

and numbered cause of action and files this Application for a

Writ of Mandamus. In support of this application Relator submits

the following:

RELATOR

Relator has exhausted his remedies and has no other adequate remedy at law.

The act sought to be compelled is ministerial and not dis

cretionary in nature. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article

11.07 provides the 420th Judicial District Court with limited

jurisdiction over habeas corpus proceedings when, as here, Relator was convicted within its court, which was cause number F1017393. Relator filed his Applicant's Motion for Leave to Conduct

Discovery and Applicant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel in

the 420th Judicial District Court on or about the 13th day of

August, 2015. In said documents, Relator requested leave to con

duct discovery and appointment of counsel in a habeas corpus pro

ceeding under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Proced

ure.

Respondent has failed to enter a ruling on Relator's motions.

Had Respondent made such a ruling, Relator would have received a

copy of the court's orders from the court clerk. Over 60 days have

lapsed since the filing of said documents and there is no statute

that requires the presiding judge to enter a ruling within any

specific amount of time. Additionally, there is no statute that

renders a motion denied by operation of law when the presiding

judge refuses to act. Relator cannot proceed with his application

for a writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code

of Criminal Procedure without a ruling on his motions.

RESPONDENT

Respondent, Presiding Judge, in his official capacity as

Judge of the 420th Judicial District Court of Nacogdoches County,

Texas, has a duty to enter decisions in criminal matters before

the court within a reasonable amount of time.

Respondent is in violation of Chapter 4 and Article 11.07 of

the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure by failing to enter a ruling

on Relators motions.

In contrast to Relator's efforts, Respondent has wholly failed to comply with Chapter 4 and Article 11.07, is acting in bad faith, and has failed to afford Relator the professional and

common courtesy of any response to his requests.

AUTHORITY

An applicant can file an application for a writ of mandamus,

requesting the trial court judge be ordered to rule on his appli

cations. Ex parte Cozzi, 138 S.W.3d 454, 455 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2004). Where, as here, the trial court judge refuses to rule on

motions related to his application, Relator can file an applica

tion for writ of mandamus, requesting the trial court judge be

ordered to rule on his motions.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Relator respectfully requests

a finding that Respondent has not made a ruling on his Motion for

Leave to Conduct Discovery and Motion for Appointment of Counsel

within a reasonable amount of time. Relator prays that an order

directing Respondent to rule on said motions within 30 days be

issued. Relator further prays for any and all other relief to

which he may be entitled.

Dated: October 13, 2015. Respectfully .s-abmitted,

O0HN JA#0B PRESLEY RELATC TDCJ No. 01690033 Mark W. Michael Unit 2664 FM 2054 Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the fore

going application has been served by placing same in the United

States Mail, postage prepaid, on the 13th day of October, 2015,

addressed to:

Presiding Judge 420th Judicial District Court 101 W. Main Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 John Jacob Presley TDCJ No. 01690033; Mark W. Michael Unit 2664 FM 2054, Tennessee Colony, Texas 75j&£6^5000

October 13, 2015 12»LCourtofAppeaJs Disfricf OCT I f?0j5 Clerk of the Court Twelfth Court of Appeals 1517 West Front Street, Suite 354 i7YLEtfTEXAS Tyler, Texas 75702 R4MESTES, CLERK RE: Original Application for a Writ of Mandamus

Dear Hon. Clerk:

Enclosed for filing with the Twelfth Court of Appeals is an Application for a Writ of Mandamus. Please file said document and bring it to the attention of the Court.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Very, truly yoZirs

fOHN J^tOB PRESL RELAT0R

CC w/encl: File

Presiding Judge 420th Judicial District Court 101 W. Main Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Cozzi
138 S.W.3d 454 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: John Jacob Presley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-jacob-presley-texapp-2015.