in Re: John Jacob Presley
This text of in Re: John Jacob Presley (in Re: John Jacob Presley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. laiszooasff-cg- S S s ^Appeate District IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OCT 162015
FOR THE TWELFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRIi TYUER TEXAS j*WESTES, CLERK TYLER, TEXAS
JOHN JACOB PRESLEY, Relator
v.
PRESIDING JUDGE, 420TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Respondent
APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM NACOGDOCHES COUNTY
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
COMES NOW, John Jacob Presley, Relator in the above-styled
and numbered cause of action and files this Application for a
Writ of Mandamus. In support of this application Relator submits
the following:
RELATOR
Relator has exhausted his remedies and has no other adequate remedy at law.
The act sought to be compelled is ministerial and not dis
cretionary in nature. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article
11.07 provides the 420th Judicial District Court with limited
jurisdiction over habeas corpus proceedings when, as here, Relator was convicted within its court, which was cause number F1017393. Relator filed his Applicant's Motion for Leave to Conduct
Discovery and Applicant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel in
the 420th Judicial District Court on or about the 13th day of
August, 2015. In said documents, Relator requested leave to con
duct discovery and appointment of counsel in a habeas corpus pro
ceeding under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Proced
ure.
Respondent has failed to enter a ruling on Relator's motions.
Had Respondent made such a ruling, Relator would have received a
copy of the court's orders from the court clerk. Over 60 days have
lapsed since the filing of said documents and there is no statute
that requires the presiding judge to enter a ruling within any
specific amount of time. Additionally, there is no statute that
renders a motion denied by operation of law when the presiding
judge refuses to act. Relator cannot proceed with his application
for a writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code
of Criminal Procedure without a ruling on his motions.
RESPONDENT
Respondent, Presiding Judge, in his official capacity as
Judge of the 420th Judicial District Court of Nacogdoches County,
Texas, has a duty to enter decisions in criminal matters before
the court within a reasonable amount of time.
Respondent is in violation of Chapter 4 and Article 11.07 of
the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure by failing to enter a ruling
on Relators motions.
In contrast to Relator's efforts, Respondent has wholly failed to comply with Chapter 4 and Article 11.07, is acting in bad faith, and has failed to afford Relator the professional and
common courtesy of any response to his requests.
AUTHORITY
An applicant can file an application for a writ of mandamus,
requesting the trial court judge be ordered to rule on his appli
cations. Ex parte Cozzi, 138 S.W.3d 454, 455 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2004). Where, as here, the trial court judge refuses to rule on
motions related to his application, Relator can file an applica
tion for writ of mandamus, requesting the trial court judge be
ordered to rule on his motions.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Relator respectfully requests
a finding that Respondent has not made a ruling on his Motion for
Leave to Conduct Discovery and Motion for Appointment of Counsel
within a reasonable amount of time. Relator prays that an order
directing Respondent to rule on said motions within 30 days be
issued. Relator further prays for any and all other relief to
which he may be entitled.
Dated: October 13, 2015. Respectfully .s-abmitted,
O0HN JA#0B PRESLEY RELATC TDCJ No. 01690033 Mark W. Michael Unit 2664 FM 2054 Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the fore
going application has been served by placing same in the United
States Mail, postage prepaid, on the 13th day of October, 2015,
addressed to:
Presiding Judge 420th Judicial District Court 101 W. Main Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 John Jacob Presley TDCJ No. 01690033; Mark W. Michael Unit 2664 FM 2054, Tennessee Colony, Texas 75j&£6^5000
October 13, 2015 12»LCourtofAppeaJs Disfricf OCT I f?0j5 Clerk of the Court Twelfth Court of Appeals 1517 West Front Street, Suite 354 i7YLEtfTEXAS Tyler, Texas 75702 R4MESTES, CLERK RE: Original Application for a Writ of Mandamus
Dear Hon. Clerk:
Enclosed for filing with the Twelfth Court of Appeals is an Application for a Writ of Mandamus. Please file said document and bring it to the attention of the Court.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Very, truly yoZirs
fOHN J^tOB PRESL RELAT0R
CC w/encl: File
Presiding Judge 420th Judicial District Court 101 W. Main Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: John Jacob Presley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-jacob-presley-texapp-2015.