in Re John Henry Boykin
This text of in Re John Henry Boykin (in Re John Henry Boykin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for writ of mandamus filed by John Henry Boykin seeks to compel his appellate attorney to file a motion to withdraw and also seeks to compel the trial court to hold a hearing on whether Boykin should be permitted to represent himself in Appeal No. 09-06-265 CR. Contrary to the allegation in the mandamus petition, Boykin's appellate counsel did file a motion to withdraw. On March 22, 2007, we abated Boykin's appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for a hearing on counsel's motion to withdraw and to admonish Boykin regarding self-representation. Boykin has an adequate remedy through the normal appellate process. See generally In re State ex rel. De Leon, 89 S.W.3d 195, 196-97 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 2002) (orig. proceeding). The petition for writ of mandamus, filed March 20, 2007, is denied.
WRIT DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered March 29, 2007
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re John Henry Boykin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-henry-boykin-texapp-2007.