In re John G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re John G.

56 A.D.2d 652, 392 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10785

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 56 A.D.2d 652 (In re John G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re John G., 56 A.D.2d 652, 392 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In proceedings pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 6, 1976, which, after a dispositional hearing, placed appellant, an adjudicated juvenile delinquent (Docket Nos. D 7572/76, D 1530/76 and D 1674/75), with the Division for Youth, Title III. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court properly exercised its [653]*653discretion in making the order of disposition. Although erroneous references were made to the appellant’s record during the hearing, we do not find that the court’s determination was impermissibly affected by them. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In proceedings pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 6, 1976, which, after a dispositional hearing, placed appellant, an adjudicated juvenile delinquent (Docket Nos. D 7572/76, D 1530/76 and D 1674/75), with the Division for Youth, Title III. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court properly exercised its [653]*653discretion in making the order of disposition. Although erroneous references were made to the appellant’s record during the hearing, we do not find that the court’s determination was impermissibly affected by them. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 652, 392 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-g-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack