in Re John Edward Letkiewicz
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-19-00322-CV __________________
IN RE JOHN EDWARD LETKIEWICZ
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13-04-04026-CV __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator John Edward Letkiewicz filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus,
in which he complains that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment
nunc pro tunc and asserts that the trial court lacked jurisdiction.
Mandamus will issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or violation
of a duty imposed by law when that abuse cannot be remedied by appeal. In re
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004); Walker v. Packer,
827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992). After reviewing the mandamus record and
1 petition, we conclude that the relator has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion by
the trial court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted October 2, 2019 Opinion Delivered October 3, 2019
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re John Edward Letkiewicz (in Re John Edward Letkiewicz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.