in Re John Edward Letkiewicz

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 3, 2019·No. 09-19-00322-CV·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00322-CV __________________

IN RE JOHN EDWARD LETKIEWICZ

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding 435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13-04-04026-CV __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator John Edward Letkiewicz filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus,

in which he complains that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment

nunc pro tunc and asserts that the trial court lacked jurisdiction.

Mandamus will issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or violation

of a duty imposed by law when that abuse cannot be remedied by appeal. In re

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004); Walker v. Packer,

827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992). After reviewing the mandamus record and

1 petition, we conclude that the relator has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion by

the trial court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted October 2, 2019 Opinion Delivered October 3, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re John Edward Letkiewicz, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in Re John Edward Letkiewicz (in Re John Edward Letkiewicz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)