in Re John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually and A/N/F James Doe, a Minor
This text of in Re John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually and A/N/F James Doe, a Minor (in Re John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually and A/N/F James Doe, a Minor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 30, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-01050-CV
IN RE JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND
A/N/F OF JAMES DOE, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On December 15, 2009, relators John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually and As Next Friend of James Doe, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to vacate orders by the Honorable Larry Weiman, presiding judge of the 80th District Court of Harris County, dated November 7, 2009, and December 4, 2009, entered in trial court cause number 2008-49120, In the Interest of B.N.G., and to stay all proceedings.
Relators have not established they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Boyce, and Sullivan.
Do Not Publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually and A/N/F James Doe, a Minor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-doe-and-jane-doe-individually-and-anf-j-texapp-2009.