in Re John Doe A/K/A Trooper

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 18, 2012·No. 01-11-00683-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 18, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-11-00683-CV

———————————

In re John doe a/k/a trooper, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Relator, John Doe a/k/a Trooper, petitioned for writ of mandamus asking that we vacate the trial court’s July 15, 2011 order authorizing real parties in interest, Robert T. Brockman and The Reynolds & Reynolds Co., to serve Google Inc. with a deposition on written questions pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202 and directing Google to produce relator’s identifying information.[1]

          We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.  Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

                                                                   Evelyn V. Keyes

                                                                   Justice

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Sharp.

Justice Sharp, dissenting.



[1]           The underlying case is In re Robert T. Brockman and The Reynolds & Reynolds Co., No. 2010-13724 (152nd Dist. Ct., Harris Cnty., Tex.), the Honorable Robert Schaffer, presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re John Doe A/K/A Trooper, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re John Doe A/K/A Trooper (in Re John Doe A/K/A Trooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.