in Re: John David Palmer
This text of in Re: John David Palmer (in Re: John David Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed February 14, 2022
In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00081-CV
IN RE JOHN DAVID PALMER, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-21-1521
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Carlyle Relator’s January 31, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial
court’s refusal to issue a citation under section 87.016(c) of the Texas Local
Government Code to remove a county judge from office. To be entitled to mandamus
relief, relator must demonstrate that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion
and that he has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d
124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Based on our review of the petition and the record before us, we conclude that
relator has failed to show his entitlement to the relief requested. Accordingly, we
deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 220081f.p05 /Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: John David Palmer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-david-palmer-texapp-2022.