in Re John-Baptist Sekumade and the Sekumade Law Firm

Opinion

Opinion issued December 29, 2011.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-11-01080-CV

———————————

IN RE THE SEKUMADE LAW FIRM AND JOHN-BAPTIST SEKUMADE, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

By petition for writ of mandamus, relators The Sekumade Law Firm and John-Baptist Sekumade complain that the trial judge abused her discretion by awarding certain costs against them, denying their motion for sanctions, and holding them in contempt for failure to comply with orders to pay costs. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

Per Curiam

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Massengale and Brown.

---

[1]           Relator identifies the underlying case as Erik Davis v. The Sekumade Law Firm and John-Baptist Sekumade, Cause No. 2011-16071 in the 295th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Caroline Baker presiding.