in Re: John Albert Estrada, Sr.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed April 3, 2013.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00383-CV
IN RE JOHN ALBERT ESTRADA, SR., Relator
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F93-26577-PJ
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on a motion that
he filed. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein.
Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief
requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); In re Coston, 07-03-0366-CV, 2003 WL 21939465 at *1 (Tex.
App.–Amarillo Aug. 13, 2003, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for
writ of mandamus.
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
130383F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: John Albert Estrada, Sr. (in Re: John Albert Estrada, Sr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.