In Re Joey Hernandez v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
October 22, 2025
No. 04-25-00595-CV
IN RE Joey HERNANDEZ
Original Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus on September 18, 2025 seeking an order directing respondent to admit and consider specific evidence, credit certain payments to child support obligations, and vacate a contempt finding. Relator has not provided an appendix or mandamus record. Having failed to provide a record, Relator has not established that he is entitled to the relief requested. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9(e) we ORDER the clerk of this court to restrict remote access to the exhibits to appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus and supplemental exhibits. See id. R. 9.9(e) (“Documents that contain unredacted sensitive data in violation of this rule must not be posted on the Internet.”); see also id. R. 9.9(a)(3) (specifying “sensitive data” includes “the name of any person who was a minor when the underlying suit was filed”).
It is so ORDERED on October 22, 2025.
Lori Massey Brissette
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016EM504786, styled Joey Hernandez v. Dulce Estrella Casas, pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Marisa Flores presiding.
04-25-00595-CV
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of October, 2025.
Caitlin A. McCamish, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Joey Hernandez v. the State of Texas (In Re Joey Hernandez v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.