in Re Joel Soto
This text of in Re Joel Soto (in Re Joel Soto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 24, 2016
No. 04-16-00383-CR
IN RE Joel SOTO
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
On November 24, 2014, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on June 24, 2016.
_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of June, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015CR8804, styled The State of Texas v. Joel Soto, pending in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Joel Soto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joel-soto-texapp-2016.