In re Joel K.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Joel K.

195 A.D.2d 1089, 601 N.Y.S.2d 880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 16, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 195 A.D.2d 1089 (In re Joel K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Joel K., 195 A.D.2d 1089, 601 N.Y.S.2d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for permission to file a late notice of appeal and for poor person relief denied with leave to renew on or before August 2, 1993, upon submission of an affidavit containing facts sufficient to demonstrate timely service of the notice of appeal. Memorandum: The motion papers are insufficient to determine whether the appeal was timely. This Court has discretion to permit late filing if the notice of appeal was timely served (see, Matter of Shannon H., 187 AD2d 1046). The time to appeal does not begin to run until service of the order appealed from with notice of entry (see, Family Ct Act § 1113). Appellant may renew her application, if necessary, upon a factual showing that the notice was timely served. Present— Pine, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed June 30, 1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to file a late notice of appeal and for poor person relief denied with leave to renew on or before August 2, 1993, upon submission of an affidavit containing facts sufficient to demonstrate timely service of the notice of appeal. Memorandum: The motion papers are insufficient to determine whether the appeal was timely. This Court has discretion to permit late filing if the notice of appeal was timely served (see, Matter of Shannon H., 187 AD2d 1046). The time to appeal does not begin to run until service of the order appealed from with notice of entry (see, Family Ct Act § 1113). Appellant may renew her application, if necessary, upon a factual showing that the notice was timely served. Present— Pine, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed June 30, 1993.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 A.D.2d 1089, 601 N.Y.S.2d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joel-k-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack