in Re: Joe Williamson Construction Company
This text of in Re: Joe Williamson Construction Company (in Re: Joe Williamson Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
_________________________________________________________ _______
IN RE: JOE WILLIAMSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
___________________________________________________________ __
___________________________________________________________ _
Relator, Joe Williamson Construction Company, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on August 4, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus with appendix, the response filed by real party in interest Raymondville Independent School District, and relator's reply to the response is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (Vernon Supp. 2006) (providing that an appeal can be taken from an interlocutory order of a district court that grants a temporary injunction). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Furthermore, on August 4, 2006, this Court granted relator's motion to stay the trial court's order of July 17, 2006, setting the trial "on the 6th of Sept. 2006 at 9 o'clock a[.]m. with announcements on Aug. 31, 2006 at 9 o'clock a[.]m," in cause number C-738-06-C in Hidalgo County. Having denied the petition, the stay is hereby lifted.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 18th day of September, 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Joe Williamson Construction Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joe-williamson-construction-company-texapp-2006.