in Re: Joe Lee Rubio

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 25, 2010·No. 13-10-00144-CV·Published

Opinion



NUMBER 13-10-00144-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG



IN RE: JOE LEE RUBIO


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Application for Stay.



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
(1)



Relator, Joe Lee Rubio, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an application for stay in the above cause on March 24, 2010. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and application for stay, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and application for stay are DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

25th day of March, 2010.



1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Joe Lee Rubio, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re: Joe Lee Rubio (in Re: Joe Lee Rubio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.