in Re: Joe Lee Gill

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 20, 2002
Docket01-02-00990-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Joe Lee Gill (in Re: Joe Lee Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Joe Lee Gill, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Opinion issued September 20, 2002







In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-02-00990-CV



IN RE JOE LEE GILL, Relator



Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court compel respondent (1) to dismiss his court-appointed counsel in cause number 912838, and appoint new counsel. The petition states that cause number 912838 is presently scheduled for trial on October 14, 2002.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. The petition does not meet the requirements of Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.

Even if it did, one of the prerequisites for the issuance of a writ of mandamus by an appellate court is that the lower court must have a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). A trial court has no duty to search for counsel agreeable to a defendant. King v. State, 29 S.W.3d 556, 566 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM



Panel consists of Justices Taft, Alcala, and Price. (2)

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

1.

Respondent is the Honorable Jim Wallace, Judge, 263rd District Court, Harris County.

2.

The Honorable Frank C. Price, former Justice, Court of Appeals, First District of Texas at Houston, participating by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. State
29 S.W.3d 556 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Barnes v. State
832 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Joe Lee Gill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joe-lee-gill-texapp-2002.