in Re: Joe Lee Gill
This text of in Re: Joe Lee Gill (in Re: Joe Lee Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 20, 2002
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00990-CV
IN RE JOE LEE GILL, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court compel respondent (1) to dismiss his court-appointed counsel in cause number 912838, and appoint new counsel. The petition states that cause number 912838 is presently scheduled for trial on October 14, 2002.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. The petition does not meet the requirements of Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.
Even if it did, one of the prerequisites for the issuance of a writ of mandamus by an appellate court is that the lower court must have a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). A trial court has no duty to search for counsel agreeable to a defendant. King v. State, 29 S.W.3d 556, 566 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Alcala, and Price. (2)
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
1. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Joe Lee Gill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joe-lee-gill-texapp-2002.