in Re Joe Adam Ramirez and Frederick Q. Herrod, Relators
This text of in Re Joe Adam Ramirez and Frederick Q. Herrod, Relators (in Re Joe Adam Ramirez and Frederick Q. Herrod, Relators) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-15-00235-CV
IN RE JOE ADAM RAMIREZ AND FREDERICK Q. HERROD, RELATORS
OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
July 10, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
Pending before the court is a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Joe Adam
Ramirez and Frederick Q. Herrod. They request that we order the court reporter and
the district clerk to provide them the appellate record in cause No. 07-15-00152-CV, the
latter being an appeal pending before us. The clerk of this court mailed the appellate
record to relators, which record was received, on June 11, 2015, by personnel at the
prison wherein relators are housed. So, there is no need to order the trial court clerk
and reporter to forward the same record. Thus, the complaint encompassed by the
petition for mandamus is moot. However, we do not address whether the relators are
entitled to a writ of mandamus against their jailers if the latter do not deliver the
appellate record to relators; that happenstance has not been raised at this time. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Joe Adam Ramirez and Frederick Q. Herrod, Relators, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joe-adam-ramirez-and-frederick-q-herrod-rela-texapp-2015.