In Re Jodha
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-173, concluding that GARY T. JODHA of PRINCETON JUNCTION, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence);
And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that GARY T. JODHA is hereby censured; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
*178 ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
7 A.3d 779 (In Re Jodha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.