In Re Jodha

7 A.3d 779, 204 N.J. 177, 2010 N.J. LEXIS 1262
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 1, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.3d 779 (In Re Jodha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Jodha, 7 A.3d 779, 204 N.J. 177, 2010 N.J. LEXIS 1262 (N.J. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-173, concluding that GARY T. JODHA of PRINCETON JUNCTION, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GARY T. JODHA is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*178 ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 A.3d 779, 204 N.J. 177, 2010 N.J. LEXIS 1262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jodha-nj-2010.