In re J.O.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re J.O.

2016 Ohio 5453, 78 N.E.3d 828, 150 Ohio St. 3d 20

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 23, 2016

DocketNo. 2014-1860

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2016 Ohio 5453 (In re J.O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re J.O., 2016 Ohio 5453, 78 N.E.3d 828, 150 Ohio St. 3d 20 (Ohio 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re D.S., 146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016-Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Brooke M. Burns, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, J.O. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re D.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re D.S., 146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016-Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Brooke M. Burns, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, J.O. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re D.S.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 Ohio 5453, 78 N.E.3d 828, 150 Ohio St. 3d 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jo-ohio-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack