In re J.M.A.
This text of 2021 IL 125680 (In re J.M.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2021 IL 125680
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
(Docket No. 125680)
In re J.M.A., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. J.M.A., Appellant).
Opinion filed January 22, 2021.
PER CURIAM
OPINION
¶1 In this case, one Justice of this court has recused himself, and the remaining members of the court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, § 3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank of Chicago, 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).
¶2 CARTER, J., took no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 IL 125680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jma-ill-2021.