In re J.M.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re J.M.

917 N.E.2d 811, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1507

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re J.M.. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 Ohio St. 3d 9 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 2, 2009·No. 2009-1628·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 91800, 2009-Ohio-2880. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII; cause held as to Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, and IV for the decision in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, and held as to Proposition of Law Nos. V, VI, and VII for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-[1508]*1508041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VIII and hold the cause for the decision in 2009-0189, In re Adrian R., Licking App. No. 08CA17, 2008-Ohio-6581.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 91800, 2009-Ohio-2880. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII; cause held as to Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, and IV for the decision in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, and held as to Proposition of Law Nos. V, VI, and VII for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-[1508]*1508041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VIII and hold the cause for the decision in 2009-0189, In re Adrian R., Licking App. No. 08CA17, 2008-Ohio-6581.

In re J.M., 917 N.E.2d 811, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1507 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

917 N.E.2d 811 (In re J.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related