In re: Jin-Ho Cynn

93 A.3d 245, 2014 WL 2807989
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 19, 2014·No. 14-BG-366·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Virginia for six months, this court’s April 14, 2014, order directing respondént to show cause why he should not be suspended for a period of six months as reciprocal discipline, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Jin-Ho Cynn is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s period of suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Jin-Ho Cynn, 93 A.3d 245, 2014 WL 2807989 (D.C. 2014).

93 A.3d 245 (In re: Jin-Ho Cynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)