in Re: Jimmy Lee Sweed

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 14, 2017
Docket08-17-00051-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Jimmy Lee Sweed (in Re: Jimmy Lee Sweed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Jimmy Lee Sweed, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

'

' No. 08-17-00051-CV IN RE: JIMMY LEE SWEED, ' AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relator. ' IN MANDAMUS '

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Jimmy Lee Sweed, has filed a mandamus petition asking that we issue the writ of

mandamus against the Honorable Gonzalo Garcia, Judge of the 210th District Court in El Paso

County, Texas. Relator requests that we order Respondent to file his motion seeking permission

to file a civil suit against several parties. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator generally must meet two requirements. First,

the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance

Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 136.

On February 20, 2008, the 210th District Court determined that Relator is a vexatious

litigant and entered a pre-filing order pursuant to Section 11.101 of the Texas Civil Practice and

Remedies Code. See TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN. § 11.101 (West 2016); see also Sweed v.

Nye, 319 S.W.3d 791 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2010, pet. denied)(affirming vexatious litigant order). Under Section 11.102, a vexatious litigant is prohibited from filing, pro se, new litigation in a court

to which the order applies without seeking the permission of the local administrative judge of the

type of court in which the vexatious litigant intends to file. See TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN.

§ 11.102 (West 2016). Additionally, the pre-filing order required Relator to deposit $5,000 into

the registry of the court as a pre-condition to filing any new suit. Sweed’s petition reflects that he

sought permission from Respondent rather than the local administrative judge as required by

Section 11.102. Finding that Relator has failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus relief, we

deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

March 14, 2017 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Sweed v. Nye
319 S.W.3d 791 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Jimmy Lee Sweed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jimmy-lee-sweed-texapp-2017.