in Re Jimmy Dale Luttrell
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-12-00296-CV
|
In re Jimmy Dale Luttrell |
RELATOR |
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Because relator is represented by appointed counsel in the trial court, this court is of the opinion that this petition should be dismissed.[2] Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: July 31, 2012
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
[2]See Ex parte Bohannan, 350 S.W.3d 116, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); In re Riley, No. 02-11-00052-CV, 2011 WL 1103829, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 24, 2011, orig. proceeding).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Jimmy Dale Luttrell (in Re Jimmy Dale Luttrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.