in Re Jim Sharp
This text of in Re Jim Sharp (in Re Jim Sharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
January 27, 2006
Mr. J.W. Beverly Dow Golub Berg & Beverly, LLP 8 Greenway Plaza, 14th Floor Houston, TX 77046
Mr. Chad Wilson Dunn Riddle & Brazil, LLP 4201 Fm 1960 W Ste 550 Houston, TX 77068 Mr. Stephen G. Tipps Baker & Botts, L.L.P. 910 Louisiana, One Shell Plaza Houston, TX 77002-4995
RE: Case Number: 06-0061 Court of Appeals Number: Trial Court Number:
Style: IN RE JIM SHARP
Dear Counsel:
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Court conditionally granted the petition for writ of mandamus and issued the enclosed opinion. The emergency motion for relief is dismissed as moot. (Justice Willett not sitting)
Sincerely, [pic]
Andrew Weber, Clerk
by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk Enclosure | | |
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jim Sharp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jim-sharp-tex-2006.