in Re Jim Hidy, Jr. and Beverly Hidy, Relators
This text of in Re Jim Hidy, Jr. and Beverly Hidy, Relators (in Re Jim Hidy, Jr. and Beverly Hidy, Relators) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00637-CV
IN RE Jim HIDY and Beverly HIDY
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 15, 2010
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On September 2, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for
temporary relief. The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the
opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of
mandamus and the motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a).
1 … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CI-08961, styled Jim Hidy, Jr. and Beverly Hidy v. Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio, Ltd., LLP d/b/a Methodist Hospital and Mark Canales, M.D., pending in the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe presiding. However, the order complained of was signed by the Honorable Janet Littlejohn, presiding judge of the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jim Hidy, Jr. and Beverly Hidy, Relators, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jim-hidy-jr-and-beverly-hidy-relators-texapp-2010.